The Cause of War and Where Do We Go From Here?

WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF WAR?

 Dear Readers,

 Once again, I have been “on retreat”. Reasons are several. My efforts to lay out explanation of “what is wrong” both nationally and globally, along with proposing what we need to do to address our humanity, is psychologically exhausting. I needed to free myself from constant ‘talking’; to take a break from my drumming. (As a child I actually took snare drum lessons for a time – wonder if there is a metaphor in that!)

 More practically, other needs of ‘home front’ nature – ranging from paper shuffling to shovel wielding – have needed attention. These are not completely addressed. I am likely to be somewhat inconsistent for a while in posting.

 Part 1:

 I am one who tends to be aware of a global reality. I sometimes find it difficult to sort out a narrow enough line of thought to make concise and focused statements. There are others who have similar awareness, who perhaps more easily focus. In my internet radio listening and website explorations I come across these. I am always grateful when I find these people speaking out!

 I do not always agree with their analyses and description detail. Sometimes I would shift or downplay examples they use. But what I do notice is intent. What is the underlying motivation of the writer/speaker? How deeply does she/he seem to have explored what for me remain essential questions: “Who are we – really –– who are we?”, and “How close or far have we managed to get to our highest potential as human beings?”

 The farther a thinker seems to travel along a path toward answering these two questions, the more I feel “in sync” with their exploration.

 One thing I notice is how many, once engaged, are unwilling to let these questions go. Their work reveals relentless effort. From experience I know that once one begins to tackle these questions, they cannot be released. Life activity that leads elsewhere always has a feel of “not as important” and one returns to the underlying questions.

 A second thing I’ve noticed is the integrity, sincerity, and effort that accompanies these explorations. Again: intent is the key. A shared intent in this kind of thinking and searching is belief that there exists some depth of understanding generally ignored in more common pursuits. There is an associated belief that “we”, as a species with remarkable qualities of ‘self-awareness’, cannot “find our way” to our highest potential until we get past ignorant, unexamined, more common, perspectives and pursuits.

 It is not enough to say: “Sure, we know we are excessive in X and Y as a species” and then resume common pursuit as if we have settled questions of humanity. This is a superficial “answer”.

 The superficial answer, however, reveals to us something of our nature! To accept superficial analysis is to behave as if what we really want is to find the next sparkly form of possession or entertainment! It is very normal, and is also a huge clue to our adolescent approach to life and its meaning!

 A third shared outcome I find among those focused on the questions: “Who are we, where are we going, where do we want to be going?” is that all these thinkers, from the most ancient to the most current, spend a lot of time exploring “consciousness”.

 They also study effect of language and symbols on ordinary thought patterns, and on ordinary commonly held beliefs of individuals and groups.

 They also speak of socialization as the primary source of unexamined, commonly held beliefs.

 Many of them delve into science measurements of brain activity. Many explore science measurement of neuro-chemical activity inside the body but not in the brain. There is an entire body of literature and “answers” known as HeartMath that pays a lot of attention to electrochemical influences between the heart organ and thought.

 Part 2:

 Now that I’ve mentioned HeartMath, I’ll shift toward a close to this post by describing and giving links to a few resources readers might want to explore.

 First I’ll answer my title question: “What is the source of war?”. The answer is that we are. You and me. Your lifestyle and my lifestyle. Your families and my family. Your friends and my friends. Your politicians and my politicians. Your economists and my economists. We – all of us – all of humanity as we now practice our humanity – are the source of war.

 We are for the most part socially and self-programmed, for psychological reasons that can be understood, to separate personal belief and choice from universal implication.

 As you begin searching, (or follow this deep questioning path you may already be on), you will notice intent. You will find some ‘searchers’ who settle on accusation of ‘other’ as ‘root cause’ of human misery. When you come across these, you will eventually feel a restriction in thinking that points away from the “all of us” perspective.

 You will find other searchers who include themselves in the entire human set of weaknesses and beauties. These are the thinkers I describe below.

The resources I list here are a tiny representation to all that is offered. They are in no particular order. All are current, presently active. One may appeal to you, another not. One may seem “on sound footing” to you, another not. I find common ground in all of them. None of them have the sole focus of individual career and material success; all remind of our shared humanity.

 Their areas of interest address social, political, economic, and civil affairs. They articulate, give speech to, common worries on the minds of nearly every person across this globe. They describe what they have examined; they cite wisdom and knowledge both ancient and current; they celebrate individual capacity. They remind that the individual is thoroughly entangled with group and civic practice. They offer insight and vision. Because each has taken a different part of “the elephant” to examine, and each has approached examination by his/her unique interests and talents, each has something to contribute.

 While many of them bring in ancient teachings, none promote “spiritual answers” as a solution. Each takes aim at our down to earth human dilemma, rooted as it is in issues of food, housing, health, and prosperity.

 I doubt any of them would take time or bother to seriously argue with one another over differences. They would, I think, all agree that we are not only the youth witnessing the naked emperor, we are also the emperor himself, as we are also the crowd watching the parade, as we are also the tailors who fashioned the emperor’s new clothes.

 Part 3: Resources

 http://www.heartmath.org/ “Expanding areas interest at the Institute of HeartMath include furthering scientific understanding of the human biofield, intuition and the emotional energetic system”. This site is quite focused on individual wellness, always a fair place to begin!  See also YouTube HeartMath posts.

 http://www.yesmagazine.org/ David Kortel, writes and speaks largely on economics with strong involvement of New Testament teachings as guidance, not as ‘religion’. “The work of the Positive Futures Network and YES! Magazine is to give visibility and momentum to these signs of an emerging society in which life, not money, is what counts; in which everyone matters; and in which vibrant, inclusive communities offer prosperity, security, and meaningful ways of life.” Video lectures by David Kortel found by browser search.

 http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/ Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, British researchers on social economic policy, social economic effect of poverty, human experience of wellness in societies of lesser or greater basic economic security. (International research with some unexpected findings.) Book: “The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better” is statistical and does not play up the “Spirit Level” part of its title. Video lectures by authors found by browser search.

 http://www.johnperkins.org/ John Perkins, author of “Confessions of an Economic Hit man”, “Hoodwinked, Why the World Financial Markets Imploded and What We Need to Do To Re-make Them.” The author had very real career for decades on the “dark side” of political/economic activity at international level. His work involved “persuading” national leaders to accomodate corporate interests. He offers views of behind the scenes reality we can only guess at, or perhaps have previously dismissed as ‘conspiracy’ thinking. Video lectures by author found by browser search.

 http://charterforcompassion.org/ Karen Armstrong, internationally recognized religious scholar and author (whose past includes an early exploration to become a nun) is launching an international compassion awareness/practice project on November 12, 2009. Video lectures by author found by browser search.

 http://www.justiceharvard.org/ Michael Sandel, internationally recognized Harvard philosophy professor’s site invites interactive exploration of philosophical question: “What is the right thing to do?” Site visitors can hear lectures, student responses, read and post their own thoughts, as well as take on other course-related reading. Outcome of the course, for campus students and site visitors, is a deepened, expanded, understanding of personal values and motivations, by examination topical, present-day, ethical social, economic, political questions. Video lectures by author found by browser search.

 http://www.jeffersonhour.org/ “Humanities scholar and author, Clay S. Jenkinson, adopts the persona of Jefferson each week to comment on current events and answer questions you may have about Jefferson’s thoughts on any and all topics”. (See left hand sidebar, “Listen to the show” to access one hour, weekly programs). Opportunity to better understand Jefferson, Adams, and other founders, “warts and all”. It’s the “warts” that we need to help balance our “commonly held superficial” understandings. Our founders, it turns out, were visionaries, also flawed in very ordinary human ways.

 http://www.talismanicidols.org/ Benjamin and Daniel Stewart, documentary film makers. Each of the above named thinkers is ‘chronologically mature.’ Each presents thought and conclusion from decades of experience and study. (An exception is Kate Pickett, but her collaborator and mentor, Richard Wilkinson is recently retired from his career as a professor.) At this time the Stewart brothers have not, to my knowledge, published any writing beyond what is found at their website. Film making is their forte.

 Part 4: Benjamin and Daniel Stewart:

 I set this resource aside as I find them difficult to “sum up” quickly.

 The Stewart brothers, however young they may be in chronological years, (under 30?), are well ahead of an imagined peer curve in depth and breadth of inquiry into the human condition. Their work is comprehensive in scope to say the least, with considerations ranging from ancient civilizations, mythology, language and symbolism, fetal development, current astronomy and neuroscience and economic history. It would take several years to property study the range of concepts they to film. Without getting lost in what could be considered ‘conspiracy’ theory, based on Burke’s Peerage, they veer into long time historical connections among world leaders. (Bloodline links among US presidents and historical European, especially British, royal lines is astonishing if it is even half-accurate. One can also consider the “6-degree” phenomenon — perhaps many more of us are so-linked than we know!)

 What the Stewart brothers ask, however, is that you and I consider who we are, our individual role. They ask we consider individual inalienable, inborn, natural intelligence and capacities and acknowledge these in each, every, conscious human anywhere on earth. They ask us to release ourselves from self-accepted and unrecognized suppression by shifting to creative consciousness found within. (They did not mention Zen, but well might have!)

 From my point of view, they raise legitimate and ignored questions of our most fundamental weaknesses and also fundamental capacities. How do we unknowingly suppress our divinity, (another word for amazing consciousness) and how do we bring ‘liberation’ to ourselves across the globe? They tackle the most ignored and pervasive aspects of human ignorance, coming closer to the ‘root’ of these than many.

 It will be interesting to note where they take their explorations in years to come. So far, they demonstrate willingness to unify principles from a range of fields of study, and demonstrate qualities of transcendent understanding. I don’t find their work ‘academic’ but they cite many references and include numerous quotes and some interview clips with leading investigators of human history and attributes. On one or two specific conclusions I would disagree, but with quiet passion, they state their findings. And their findings are driven by underlying questions “Who are we; what is our purpose, what inborn qualities within us are available to us as we shape our present and future worlds?” In the course of this investigation, they address “Where does war come from?”

 They present their findings without preaching, with acceptance of their own ‘flawed’ humanity. Their intent is to further awaken us. Quite simply – there is nowhere for us to “go”, to “look for” answers to human misery, other than to explore the primary questions: “What is our nature, and how does it play a role in a social political world?”

 The underlying principle of “Thoughts from the Well”, that “everything is a model for everything else”, is supported in their work. Individual experience and development is mirrored in the universe’s unfolding; social political economic invention and policy reveal the best and the worst within each of us. Who ‘they’ are is who ‘we’ are; you and I reflect and reveal humanity shared to one another.

 Here is a link to a 1.5 hr video presentation, Kymatica. The version has qualities of a “draft” but is very worth the watch. I hope it holds as a viable link. I believe their work is available in published quality but have not found a quick link. An earlier film by the Stewart brothers, “Esoteric Agenda,” is more ‘conspiracy’ in theme. “Kymatica”, moves beyond the us/them perspective that goes with conspiracy thinking. It explores necessity and gift of personal capacity and responsibility, while it offers insight into individual “inherent flaws” that are barriers to freedom of thought.  (We claim we want ‘freedom’ but are so unwittingly socialized that we scarcely know who we are.)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6736722752013377089# A caution: near the end the film explores cruelty, including cruelty to animals. With mis-giving I allowed myself to view some of this. I wish I had fast forwarded through that part, even though it was very brief. As critical as any other point the Stewart brothers make is their point on reaction to animal cruelty:  The moment we experience horror at another’s extreme cruelty is the moment we deny the humanity of the perpetrator and deny our potential for the same.  This is one of the toughest sticking spots for me even though I know it’s truth. 

 Part 5:

 As said above, the cause of war is us – you and me, our inherent weaknesses, our unexamined acquired beliefs, and these same qualities amplified in the groups to which we claim allegiance, from family to nation.

 We can continue hand-wringing mystification on the cause of war. We can continue comfortable blame of villains, and continue war as means to peace.

 Or we can move past adolescence and come to know ourselves better. In the first practices, already in place, there is nothing to be gained.

 In the last there is true and deep frontier adventure, also perhaps a new age of humanity and honoring life.

 My deeply felt best to each of you – MaggieAnn

Advertisements

About maggieannthoeni

A description once given of me was "rooted in the earth while roaming the stars" - and this has felt 'right'. I believe in something akin to this for each of us. I am a passionate supporter of discovering the autonomous self while serving the whole as primary intent. I believe in discovery of innate principles, clearing the overlay of socialization that obscures this from us. I believe it is our responsibility to leave no one behind - most particularly to respond to suffering as best we can whereever we find it, whenever we are made aware. I believe in this for the insect as well as the most magnificent form of humanity. I believe in brother/sisterhood without boundary. I believe in righteous indignation when it is appropriate, but do not believe in an enemy. I believe in consciousness, in intelligence, in logic, in rationality, in emotion, in transcendence - and am convinced until we generally practice explore and honor all this in ourselves, we remain profoundly immature. (I believe real maturity is known and practiced by many young children, and not enough adults!)
This entry was posted in Education, Philosophy/Psychology/Human Nature, Social-Political and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Cause of War and Where Do We Go From Here?

  1. Isadore says:

    In response to part two:

    What do you mean ‘we’ …? ‘They’ are not my politicians and ‘they’ are not my economists. And I fail to comprehend how my modest lifestyle is in any meaningfull way the cause of any war. I always keep in mind that my responsibility is only equal to my authority and that those who have great authority have great responsibility and in matters of war I have little or no authority and little or no responsibility in fact. The theory might be that ‘we’ are responsible for our government, however in the practice of a representative democracy prone to the influence of various monied lobbyists, fact varies markedly from theory at the best of times. The fact of the matter is that we go to war for many reasons, as a response to aggression (self defence) , when we want to take something by force from someone else (armed robbery), to honour a mutual defence pact (WW-2), as a preemptive response to fear (Gulf war, Afghanistan), and the list goes on and on but at the source you will invariably find one or more psycopaths wreaking havok on the world. These miscreants have the uncanny ability to worm their way to the highest levels of any organization be it corporation, government, military or even, perish the thought, religion. And they have great authority, and they have great responsibility and THEY are the cause of wars….not me. Most of us are like the trees in the forest, there could be no forest fire without us, but ‘we’ did not light the match, and ‘we’ are more victim than perpetrator. That does not mean that ‘we’ cannot rally together to try and stop a war as happened in the late sixties with the anti-war demonstrations in the U.S. These demonstrations ceased with the withdrawel of American troops from Vietnam in 1973 but were soon forgotten with the advent of Desert storm, the twin towers, Bin Laden and Al Quaida, Saddam Hussein and his mythical WMD, the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan. Bush, Chaney, Rumsfeld, Tony Blair, The U.N.

    Appx. 1.4 million dead

    Not my fault!

    • maggieannthoeni says:

      I’ve written an entire new post trying to respond but now see I have not addressed my use of “my/your economist”, etc. When linking you and me to these unknown thinkers and policy shapers, I am thinking of how each of us, simply by being an ordinary social person, operates by the influences of these people. I recognize these people as my sisters and brothers in my human family, whether or not they recognize me similarly. This does not mean I make excuse for them and never find them unhelpful. Far from it. The point of my new post is that I can confront them, can continue to speak to our human need to shift our perspectives and use of skills and talents. –MA

  2. Isadore says:

    When you ask ,” How close or how far have we managed to get to our highest potential as human beings?”, you assume that humans through the ages have been advancing towards their highest potential. Upon what evidence do you base this assumption? I find far more evidence to support the statement that humans have managed, through the ages, to retreat from their highest potential and are doing so at an alarmingly accelerating rate. Evolution or devolution, I guess it depends on what is considered progress towards or from a higher potential.

    One billion humans are starving today.

    Up to 100 million homeless people trying to sleep tonight.

    There are more non literate people in the world today than at any time in this century, one billion .

    8.75 million people in prisons throughout the world.

    4000 deaths a day due to indoor air pollution.

    This year there will be about 250 million cases of water related disease and approximately 5 to 10 million deaths throughout the world.

    I could go on but I’m starting to get really depressed by these numbers. Surely this is not progress towards a higher human potential, unless one means a higher potential for human misery, suffering, ignorance and death.

    • maggieannthoeni says:

      I believe higher, more noble, more pleasant and genuinely caring, potential is always with us, that it arrives with us when we are born. I believe we can understand our innate fears and tendency to excess (which we already demonstrated with such high degree of success!) Sometimes I am overwhelmed by the statistics you give. They are all too real. Then I have to ‘remember’ that I believe in something better – and carry on! — MA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s